FigsFlow vs GoProposal: Why FigsFlow is Better

When choosing a platform to manage practice, one should consider choosing a system that is feature-rich, flexible and offers value-added services. However, with so many options available like FigsFlow and GoProposal, one has to question, between FigsFlow vs GoProposal, which is better?

FigsFlow excels in all these aspects and, hence, is meant to become an ideal solution for all kinds of businesses willing to have productivity and results without paying over the odds. Here is a close view of how FigsFlow outperforms the competitor, GoProposal, and is the ideal choice when deciding which is better between FigsFlow vs GoProposal.

Features	FigsFlow	GoProposal
More Affordable Pricing	✓	✖
Multiple Workspace/Firms	✓	✖
Access to All Templates Without Extra Cost	✓	✖
Generate Multiple LOEs per Proposal	✓	✖
Full Document Editing	✓	✖
Engagement Letter Plans	✓	✖
Advanced Role Management	✓	✖
Create and Add Sub-Services	✓	✖
Assign Email Templates to Steps and Triggers	✓	✖
Automatic LOE Selection by Entity Type	✓	✖
Seamless HubSpot Integration	✓	✖
Flexible Template Structure	✓	✖
Guided Onboarding	✓	✖

Pricing

FigsFlow offers competitive pricing starting from £10, apart from having flexible plans for different needs: the lite plan is £10, basic is £24, standard costs £48, and professional is £90. In comparison, GoProposal will start at £65, making FigsFlow more affordable right from the very beginning.

Plans

FigsFlow’s plans come with templates for engagement letters, allowing users to actually make contracts without facing any pricing constraints. In GoProposal, this is not possible; hence, it is not flexible with the different business needs.

Customisable

Between FigsFlow vs GoProposal, FigsFlow offers customisable plans that are tailor-made to suit different types of firms created by the sales team upon request. GoProposal has none of these customisations, making limited choices for businesses.

User Capacity

Where FigsFlow’s base plan includes two users even on the lite plan, GoProposal only offers one user on its basic plan, meaning an upgrade for additional users.

Market Type

With FigsFlow pricing, it fits for any firm size starting from small to large firms with cost being a factor. GoProposal, on the other hand, does relatively attract larger firms with its higher pricing.

Document Capacity

Even when it comes to the document capacity between FigsFlow vs GoProposal, FigsFlow will let you send up to 10 LOEs-even on the lite plan-while GoProposal limits this to just five documents in its basic plan, and thus restricts firms in engaging clients.

Multiple Firms and Workspaces

Between FigsFlow vs GoProposal, FigsFlow supports several workspaces and firms within one account, which makes it great for businesses managing multiple entities. GoProposal doesn’t, therefore, reducing its scalability.

Automatic LOE Selection

This makes the LOE auto-selection by entity type in FigsFlow efficient and less cumbersome, hence less manual involvement. In GoProposal, this has to be done manually, adding steps and a chance for errors.

Service and Library of Templates

When it comes to the pricing between FigsFlow vs GoProposal, FigsFlow, in its base price, contains a comprehensive service and LOE template library. GoProposal, however, limits template access in their base price and charges an additional £40 per month.

LOE and Proposals

FigsFlow allows multiple LOEs per proposal, giving the user more flexibility and customisation. GoProposal allows only one LOE per proposal and limits adaptability.

Editing Flexibility

Even when it comes to flexibility between FigsFlow vs GoProposal, FigsFlow gives users the ability to edit all sections of proposals and LOEs at the point of creation for complete customisation. GoProposal allows edits on only certain sections, affecting user control.

Document Creation Beyond Limits

Once document limits are exceeded, with FigsFlow, it will enable the sending of additional documents at just £1 per document, an incredibly low cost. On GoProposal, the user is forced to upgrade, and this can get very expensive.

Roles Creation and Assignment

FigsFlow boasts advanced role management. Such as that firms are able to create bespoke roles that may give access to certain materials or tools within the platform. With GoProposal, only a few pre-defined roles are available; this really restricts team efficiency and collaboration.

Sub-Services

With FigsFlow, users can assign sub-services to every main service, hence further structuring the services. This GoProposal cannot do; that reduces flexibility.

Email Templates

Between FigsFlow vs GoProposal, FigsFlow allows attaching email templates to steps and triggers for smarter communication. GoProposal has only basic LOE email templates with no automation.

HubSpot Integration

FigsFlow is perfectly integrated with HubSpot to make most of the CRM data in driving intelligent proposals and client engagement. GoProposal cannot do that, and transitions for clients are more manual.

Flexibility in Template Structure

FigsFlow allows users to enjoy flexible templates, allowing them to add, move, and edit sections in engagement letter templates. GoProposal requires one to stick with fixed templates, thereby limiting customisation.

Onboarding

FigsFlow provides step-by-step onboarding questionnaires to make sure all the templates and settings are preloaded as required. GoProposal does not have guided onboarding; one has to find their way around.

Dashboard

Even when comparing the dashboard between FigsFlow vs GoProposal, FigsFlow has an intuitive dashboard that greatly enhances usability. GoProposal has limited functionality on its dashboard, hence limiting users’ experience.

Automatic Notifications

FigsFlow provides the possibility to customise notifications in case these proposals take more time than expected; this way, it will notify the customer. This is very good for customer management. GoProposal does not have this option.

Automated Pricing

FigsFlow allows pricing to be Hourly, Contingent, and Customised, which automatically convert into Monthly, Annual, or Quarterly rates. GoProposal has less flexibility; its pricing comes from pre-set models.

Terms and Privacy Policy

Between FigsFlow vs GoProposal, FigsFlow proves to be quite flexible. It offers custom terms and privacy policies according to each service being provided. GoProposal has universal rules and thus it limits customisation.

Ability to Add Item wise Notes

FigsFlow will allow for item-specific notes, and hence no detail gets left behind. GoProposal allows taking up notes only on the whole proposals, thereby minimising the specificity of the notes.

Companies House Integration

Because of FigsFlow’s integration with Companies House, all details of the client auto populate; this improves accuracy. GoProposal requires the data to be entered manually.

Client Database

In FigsFlow, everything starting from revenues, proposals, timeline, and even audit trails get captured in the client database. GoProposal captures only very basic client details, making it too limited in terms of insight generation.

Signatures

Meanwhile, between FigsFlow vs GoProposal, FigsFlow supports several documents and LOE signatures in one go, which saves the time of the users. In GoProposal, it is necessary to sign documents individually.

Email CC Assignment

In FigsFlow, every email template can be assigned to a person or department, enabling the user to decide more precisely who gets what emails. In GoProposal, only universal email CC assignments are supported.

Smooth Transition from Other Systems

This in-house program at FigsFlow has made the transition from any previous system much easier, while GoProposal is a bit more difficult regarding transitions. This adds complexity.

Conclusion

With all of the above being stated, it becomes evident that when choosing between what software is best between FigsFlow vs GoProposal, FigsFlow is better. It represents an all-in-one, budget-friendly solution for solving different needs that businesses may have while managing engagement letters and proposals. Offering them flexible pricing, greater scope for customisation, and seamless integrations, FigsFlow doesn’t just create more efficiency for professionals, but it also carves unparalleled value against GoProposal.

From multi-user access and granular role management to automating document handling and integrating with HubSpot, FigsFlow gives firms all the tools needed to manage a streamlined operation and create better client relationships, making it a clear winner between FigsFlow vs GoProposal.

---