Ignition vs FigsFlow: Comparison Through an Accountants’ Perspective

Can FigsFlow Be an Ignition Alternative?

FigsFlow’s Lite plan starts at just £10 per month, with no hidden costs, making it budget-friendly for firms of all sizes. By contrast, Ignition charges $39 dollars per month for its Solo plan, with costs reaching £399 per month for the Pro+ plan.

FigsFlow is built specifically for accountants, tax advisers and bookkeepers, providing deep customisation for engagement letters and proposals. Ignition, however, may appear to a rigid workflow with limited adaptability.

FigsFlow offers ready-made templates including automated engagement letters that meet CIOT and ACCA standards. Ignition’s template library, while functional, lacks the same level of accountant-specific customisation, making it less ideal for professional accounting firms.

FigsFlow also provides granular user controls, allowing firms to define specific roles and permissions for better security and workflow management. Ignition’s predefined permission settings are far less flexible, limiting access for your team.

Moreover, FigsFlow allows firms to manage both main services and sub-services within proposals, keeping pricing and detail accurate.

Lastly, FigsFlow lets you add your branding even on its basic plan, helping your business’s identity shine through. Ignition reserves this feature for its higher-tier plans, making it an expensive add-on.

Conclusion: Ignition vs FigsFlow

FigsFlow is the winner for accounting, tax advisory and professional services firms. It’s more affordable, flexible and packed with features like advanced role management, automated engagement letter selection and easy integrations.

If you’re looking for a tool that combines speed and customisation, FigsFlow is a smart choice. It’s designed to grow with your firm, helping you deliver exceptional client service while keeping costs in check.

Choose FigsFlow and take your practice management to the next level.

Frequently Asked Questions